General
This question is more than six months old, so the information in the answer may no longer be accurate.
Visitor asks:
Hello!
A few years ago the nerve in one of my teeth died. The non-vital tooth was then treated and sealed. A few months ago, however, part of this tooth chipped or broke off. In order to place a post, my dentist referred me for an X-ray at the time. After examining the image, she found a cyst (granuloma) (?). While reading medical opinions on the internet, I found that such lesions are appropriately removed surgically. When I mentioned this in relation to my case, she replied that it was a small cyst that did not need to be removed. I would like to know whether the dentist acted correctly by placing a post in a tooth whose root is affected by a granuloma.
I sincerely thank you for your opinion!
Dentist Tomaž Rotar answers:
Dear Sir/Madam!
In the situation described, the only relevant criterion for the appropriateness of the treatment is the decision of the dentist concerned. Every dentist stands behind his or her decision and is also responsible for it through the warranty on the fixed prosthetic restoration placed on the tooth. Surgical removal of a periapical lesion (granuloma) is also possible later, despite an already fabricated crown and post.
Have a nice day!
✦ This content was translated from the original with the assistance of an AI translation system.
← Your questions